Skip to content

CMS and content management

A CMS the team uses without technical help

A website only stays current if it is easy to edit. Tejobit sets up and builds a CMS around the people who write: WordPress, a headless CMS or EmDash, with clear fields and a preview before publishing.

Abstract render: rounded glass sheets fanned out, the front one in blue, like pages of content.

What is included

Edit without fear of breaking anything

  • The right choice of CMS

    The recommendation starts from who edits, how often and what the site needs, and comes with the reasoning in writing.

  • Clear fields

    Instead of a blank page, fields for the title, image, price or opening hours, and the design stays intact.

  • Drafts and preview

    See the page exactly as it will look before publishing it.

  • Editorial roles

    Who writes, who reviews and who publishes, each with the right permissions.

  • Content migration

    Pages, news and images brought over from the old site, with redirects so no traffic is lost.

  • A short guide

    The day-to-day steps explained on one page, for the people who edit and for whoever joins later.

Options

Three paths, depending on the team

  • WordPress

    The best known

    A huge ecosystem and a dashboard many teams already know. A good fit when the team already uses it or needs features that exist as plugins.

  • Headless

    Content separate from the site

    Content is managed in a CMS and the site is built separately, which gives design freedom and very fast pages. A good fit for sites with their own design or several outputs.

  • EmDash

    A recent CMS

    A recent open-source CMS. A good fit for new sites that want a simple dashboard without maintaining a WordPress server.

Typical cases

When it makes sense

  • News and events that change every week

    The team publishes without asking anyone and without breaking the page layout.

  • A menu or a price list

    Dedicated fields for each dish or service, instead of a PDF someone has to redo.

  • A multilingual website

    Each piece of content linked to its translation, and nothing published in only one language by mistake.

  • Leaving a heavy or abandoned CMS

    Migrating content to something simpler and faster, without losing what is already indexed.

How it works

Designed around the people who edit

  1. 01

    Understand the routine

    Who edits what and how often, and what currently forces them to ask for help.

  2. 02

    Choose and model

    The CMS and the content types, with the fields each page needs.

  3. 03

    Build and migrate

    The site connected to the CMS and the existing content imported and reviewed.

  4. 04

    Hand over

    Accounts created, roles assigned and a short guide for day-to-day use.

Frequently asked questions

Before you start

Which CMS is best?

It depends on who edits, how often and what the site needs. The recommendation comes with the reasons, in writing, in the proposal.

Does the team need training?

The fields are designed to be obvious, and the handover includes a short guide with the day-to-day steps.

Can content be migrated from the current website?

Yes. Pages, articles and images are imported and reviewed, and old addresses are redirected to the new ones.

Is a headless CMS harder to use?

For the people who edit, it does not have to be. The difference is behind the scenes: the editing dashboard and the site are separate pieces.

A team that needs to edit the website on its own?

Say who edits, what and how often. The reply recommends a path and what it costs.